| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Bookmark and share this page: |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Whey Protein and Muscle |
|
|
|
Minimal whey protein with carbohydrate stimulates muscle protein synthesis following resistance exercise in trained young men.
Tang JE, et al. (2007) |
|
|
|
Stimulation of net muscle protein synthesis by whey protein ingestion before and after exercise.
Tipton JD, et al. (2007) |
|
|
|
Ingestion of casein and whey proteins result in muscle anabolism after resistance exercise.
Tipton KD, et al. (2004)
• Compares whey protein &
casein protein |
|
|
|
The effects of protein and amino acid supplementation on performance and training adaptations during ten weeks of resistance training.
Kerksick CM, et al. (2006)
• Compares whey protein &
BCAA to whey protein & casein protein |
|
|
|
The effect of whey isolate and resistance training on strength, body composition, and plasma glutamine.
Cribb PJ, et al. (2006)
• Compares hydrolyzed whey
protein isolate & casein protein |
|
|
|
Soy versus whey protein bars: effects on exercise training impact on lean body mass and antioxidant status.
Brown EC, (2004)
• Compares whey protein &
soy protein |
|
|
|
The effect of whey protein supplementation with and
without creatine monohydrate combined with resistance training on lean tissue mass and muscle strength.
Burke, et al. (2001)
• Compares whey protein
alone & whey protein with creatine |
|
|
|
Effects of whey isolate, creatine, and resistance training on muscle hypertrophy.
Cribb, et al. (2007)
• Compares whey protein
alone & whey protein with creatine |
|
|
|
Minimal whey protein with carbohydrate stimulates muscle protein synthesis following resistance exercise in trained young men. |
|
|
|
Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Dec;32(6):1132-8. |
|
|
|
Authors: Tang JE, Manolakos JJ, Kujbida GW, Lysecki PJ, Moore DR, Phillips SM. |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: Whey protein is a supplemental protein source often used by athletes, particularly those aiming to gain muscle mass; however, direct evidence for its efficacy in stimulating muscle protein synthesis (MPS) is lacking. We aimed to determine the impact of consuming whey protein on skeletal muscle protein turnover in the post-exercise period. Eight healthy resistance-trained young men (age=21+/-1 .0 years; BMI=26.8+/-0.9 kg/m2 (means+/-SE)) participated in a double-blind randomized crossover trial in which they performed a unilateral leg resistance exercise workout (EX: 4 sets of knee extensions and 4 sets of leg press; 8-10 repetitions/set; 80% of maximal), such that one leg was not exercised and acted as a rested (RE) comparator. After exercise, subjects consumed either an isoenergetic whey protein plus carbohydrate beverage (WHEY: 10 g protein and 21 g fructose) or a carbohydrate-only beverage (CHO: 21 g fructose and 10 g maltodextran). Subjects received pulse-tracer injections of L-[ring-2H5]phenylalanine and L-[15N]phenylalanine to measure MPS. Exercise stimulated a rise in MPS in the WHEY-EX and CHO-EX legs, which were greater than MPS in the WHEY-RE leg and the CHO-RE leg (all p<0.05), respectively. The rate of MPS in the WHEY-EX leg was greater than in the CHO-EX leg (p<0.001). We conclude that a small dose (10 g) of whey protein with carbohydrate (21 g) can stimulate a rise in MPS after resistance exercise in trained young men that would be supportive of a positive net protein balance, which, over time, would lead to hypertrophy.
|
|
|
|
Stimulation of net muscle protein synthesis by whey protein ingestion before and after exercise. |
|
|
|
Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jan;292(1):E71-6. Epub 2006 Aug 8. |
|
|
|
Authors: Tipton KD, Elliott TA, Cree MG, Aarsland AA, Sanford AP, Wolfe RR. |
|
|
|
|
The Univ. of Birmingham, School of Sport & Exercise Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmington B15 2TT, UK. K.D.Tipton@Bham.ac.uk
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: Timing of nutrient ingestion has been demonstrated to influence the anabolic response of muscle following exercise. Previously, we demonstrated that net amino acid uptake was greater when free essential amino acids plus carbohydrates were ingested before resistance exercise rather than following exercise. However, it is unclear if ingestion of whole proteins before exercise would stimulate a superior response compared with following exercise. This study was designed to examine the response of muscle protein balance to ingestion of whey proteins both before and following resistance exercise. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to one of two groups. A solution of whey proteins was consumed either immediately before exercise (PRE; n = 8) or immediately following exercise (POST; n = 9). Each subject performed 10 sets of 8 repetitions of leg extension exercise. Phenylalanine concentrations were measured in femoral arteriovenous samples to determine balance across the leg. Arterial amino acid concentrations were elevated by approximately 50%, and net amino acid balance switched from negative to positive following ingestion of proteins at either time. Amino acid uptake was not significantly different between PRE and POST when calculated from the beginning of exercise (67 +/- 22 and 27 +/- 10 for PRE and POST, respectively) or from the ingestion of each drink (60 +/- 17 and 63 +/- 15 for PRE and POST, respectively). Thus the response of net muscle protein balance to timing of intact protein ingestion does not respond as does that of the combination of free amino acids and carbohydrate.
|
|
|
|
Ingestion of casein and whey proteins result in muscle anabolism after resistance exercise. |
|
|
|
Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Dec;36(12):2073-81. |
|
|
|
Authors: Tipton KD, Elliott TA, Cree MG, Wolf SE, Sanford AP, Wolfe RR. |
|
|
|
|
Metabolism Unit, Shriners Hospitals for Children and Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA. ktipton@utmb.edu
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Determination of the anabolic response to
exercise and nutrition is important for individuals who
may benefit from increased muscle mass. Intake of free
amino acids after resistance exercise stimulates net
muscle protein synthesis. The response of muscle protein
balance to intact protein ingestion after exercise has
not been studied. This study was designed to examine the
acute response of muscle protein balance to ingestion of
two different intact proteins after resistance exercise.
METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomly
assigned to one of three groups. Each group consumed one
of three drinks: placebo (PL; N = 7), 20 g of casein
(CS; N = 7), or whey proteins (WH; N = 9). Volunteers
consumed the drink 1 h after the conclusion of a leg
extension exercise bout. Leucine and phenylalanine
concentrations were measured in femoral arteriovenous
samples to determine balance across the leg. RESULTS:
Arterial amino acid concentrations were elevated by
protein ingestion, but the pattern of appearance was
different for CS and WH. Net amino acid balance switched
from negative to positive after ingestion of both
proteins. Peak leucine net balance over time was greater
for WH (347 +/- 50 nmol.min(-1).100 mL(-1) leg) than CS
(133 +/- 45 nmol.min(-1).100 mL(-1) leg), but peak
phenylalanine balance was similar for CS and WH.
Ingestion of both CS and WH stimulated a significantly
larger net phenylalanine uptake after resistance
exercise, compared with the PL (PL -5 +/- 15 mg, CS 84
+/- 10 mg, WH 62 +/- 18 mg). Amino acid uptake relative
to amount ingested was similar for both CS and WH
(approximately 10-15%).
CONCLUSIONS: Acute ingestion of both WH and CS
after exercise resulted in similar increases in muscle
protein net balance, resulting in net muscle protein
synthesis despite different patterns of blood amino acid
responses.
|
|
|
|
The effects of protein and amino acid supplementation on performance and training adaptations during ten weeks of resistance training. |
|
|
|
Journal: J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Aug;20(3):643-53. |
|
|
|
Authors: Kerksick CM, Rasmussen CJ, Lancaster SL, Magu B, Smith P, Melton C, Greenwood M, Almada AL, Earnest CP, Kreider RB. |
|
|
|
|
Center for Exercise, Nutrition and Preventive Health Research, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of whey protein supplementation on body composition, muscular strength, muscular endurance, and anaerobic capacity during 10 weeks of resistance training. Thirty-six resistance-trained males (31.0 +/- 8.0 years, 179.1 +/- 8.0 cm, 84.0 +/- 12.9 kg, 17.8 +/- 6.6%) followed a 4 days-per-week split body part resistance training program for 10 weeks. Three groups of supplements were randomly assigned, prior to the beginning of the exercise program, in a double-blind manner to all subjects: 48 g per day (g.d(-1)) carbohydrate placebo (P), 40 g.d(-1) of whey protein + 8 g.d(-1) of casein (WC), or 40 g.d(-1) of whey protein + 3 g.d(-1) branched-chain amino acids + 5 g.d(-1) L-glutamine (WBG). At 0, 5, and 10 weeks, subjects were tested for fasting blood samples, body mass, body composition using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench and leg press, 80% 1RM maximal repetitions to fatigue for bench press and leg press, and 30-second Wingate anaerobic capacity tests. No changes (p > 0.05) were noted in all groups for energy intake, training volume, blood parameters, and anaerobic capacity. WC experienced the greatest increases in DEXA lean mass (P = 0.0 +/- 0.9; WC = 1.9 +/- 0.6; WBG = -0.1 +/- 0.3 kg, p < 0.05) and DEXA fat-free mass (P = 0.1 +/- 1.0; WC = 1.8 +/- 0.6; WBG = -0.1 +/- 0.2 kg, p < 0.05). Significant increases in 1RM bench press and leg press were observed in all groups after 10 weeks. In this study, the combination of whey and casein protein promoted the greatest increases in fat-free mass after 10 weeks of heavy resistance training. Athletes, coaches, and nutritionists can use these findings to increase fat-free mass and to improve body composition during resistance training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The effect of whey isolate and resistance training on strength, body composition, and plasma glutamine. |
|
|
|
Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2006 Oct;16(5):494-509. |
|
|
|
Authors: Cribb PJ, Williams AD, Carey MF, Hayes A. |
|
|
|
|
Center for Exercise, Nutrition and Preventive Health Research, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: Different dietary
proteins affect whole body protein anabolism and
accretion and therefore, have the potential to influence
results obtained from resistance training. This study
examined the effects of supplementation with two
proteins, hydrolyzed whey isolate (WI) and casein (C),
on strength, body composition, and plasma glutamine
levels during a 10 wk, supervised resistance training
program. In a double-blind protocol, 13 male,
recreational bodybuilders supplemented their normal diet
with either WI or C (1.5 gm/kg body wt/d) for the
duration of the program. Strength was assessed by 1-RM
in three exercises (barbell bench press, squat, and
cable pull-down). Body composition was assessed by dual
energy X-ray absorptiometry. Plasma glutamine levels
were determined by the enzymatic method with
spectrophotometric detection. All assessments occurred
in the week before and the week following 10 wk of
training. Plasma glutamine levels did not change in
either supplement group following the intervention.
The WI group achieved a significantly greater gain (P <
0.01) in lean mass than the C group (5.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 0.8
+/- 0.4 kg for WI and C, respectively) and a significant
(P < 0.05) change in fat mass (-1.5 +/- 0.5 kg) compared
to the C group (+0.2 +/- 0.3 kg). The WI group
also achieved significantly greater (P < 0.05)
improvements in strength compared to the C group in each
assessment of strength. When the strength changes were
expressed relative to body weight, the WI group still
achieved significantly greater (P < 0.05) improvements
in strength compared to the C group.
|
|
| |
|
The effect of whey isolate and resistance training on strength, body composition, and plasma glutamine. |
|
|
|
Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2006 Oct;16(5):494-509. |
|
|
|
Authors: Cribb PJ, Williams AD, Carey MF, Hayes A. |
|
|
|
|
Center for Exercise, Nutrition and Preventive Health Research, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: Different dietary
proteins affect whole body protein anabolism and
accretion and therefore, have the potential to influence
results obtained from resistance training. This study
examined the effects of supplementation with two
proteins, hydrolyzed whey isolate (WI) and casein (C),
on strength, body composition, and plasma glutamine
levels during a 10 wk, supervised resistance training
program. In a double-blind protocol, 13 male,
recreational bodybuilders supplemented their normal diet
with either WI or C (1.5 gm/kg body wt/d) for the
duration of the program. Strength was assessed by 1-RM
in three exercises (barbell bench press, squat, and
cable pull-down). Body composition was assessed by dual
energy X-ray absorptiometry. Plasma glutamine levels
were determined by the enzymatic method with
spectrophotometric detection. All assessments occurred
in the week before and the week following 10 wk of
training. Plasma glutamine levels did not change in
either supplement group following the intervention.
The WI group achieved a significantly greater gain (P <
0.01) in lean mass than the C group (5.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 0.8
+/- 0.4 kg for WI and C, respectively) and a significant
(P < 0.05) change in fat mass (-1.5 +/- 0.5 kg) compared
to the C group (+0.2 +/- 0.3 kg). The WI group
also achieved significantly greater (P < 0.05)
improvements in strength compared to the C group in each
assessment of strength. When the strength changes were
expressed relative to body weight, the WI group still
achieved significantly greater (P < 0.05) improvements
in strength compared to the C group.
|
|
| |
|
Soy versus whey protein bars: effects on exercise training impact on lean body mass and antioxidant status. |
|
|
|
Journal: Nutr J. 2004 Dec 8;3:22. |
|
|
|
Authors: Brown EC, DiSilvestro RA, Babaknia A, Devor ST. |
|
|
|
|
Department of Sport & Exercise Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. ebrown76@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Although soy protein may have many
health benefits derived from its associated
antioxidants, many male exercisers avoid soy protein.
This is due partly to a popular, but untested notion
that in males, soy is inferior to whey in promoting
muscle weight gain. This study provided a direct
comparison between a soy product and a whey product.
METHODS: Lean body mass gain was examined in
males from a university weight training class given
daily servings of micronutrient-fortified protein bars
containing soy or whey protein (33 g protein/day, 9
weeks, n = 9 for each protein treatment group). Training
used workouts with fairly low repetition numbers per
set. A control group from the class (N = 9) did the
training, but did not consume either type protein bar.
RESULTS: Both the soy and whey treatment groups showed a
gain in lean body mass, but the training-only group did
not. The whey and training only groups, but not the soy
group, showed a potentially deleterious post-training
effect on two antioxidant-related related parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Soy and whey protein bar products
both promoted exercise training-induced lean body mass
gain, but the soy had the added benefit of preserving
two aspects of antioxidant function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The effect of whey protein supplementation with and without creatine monohydrate combined with resistance training on lean tissue mass and muscle strength. |
|
|
|
Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2001 Sep;11(3):349-64. |
|
|
|
Authors: Burke DG, Chilibeck PD, Davidson KS, Candow DG, Farthing J, Smith-Palmer T. |
|
|
|
|
Department of Human Kinetics, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: Our purpose was
to assess muscular adaptations during 6 weeks of
resistance training in 36 males randomly assigned to
supplementation with whey protein (W; 1.2 g/kg/day),
whey protein and creatine monohydrate (WC; 0.1
g/kg/day), or placebo (P; 1.2 g/kg/day maltodextrin).
Measures included lean tissue mass by dual energy x-ray
absorptiometry, bench press and squat strength
(1-repetition maximum), and knee extension/flexion peak
torque. Lean tissue mass increased to a greater extent
with training in WC compared to the other groups, and in
the W compared to the P group (p < .05). Bench press
strength increased to a greater extent for WC compared
to W and P (p < .05). Knee extension peak torque
increased with training for WC and W (p < .05), but not
for P. All other measures increased to a similar extent
across groups. Continued training without
supplementation for an additional 6 weeks resulted in
maintenance of strength and lean tissue mass in all
groups. Males that supplemented with whey protein while
resistance training demonstrated greater improvement in
knee extension peak torque and lean tissue mass than
males engaged in training alone. Males that supplemented
with a combination of whey protein and creatine had
greater increases in lean tissue mass and bench press
than those who supplemented with only whey protein or
placebo. However, not all strength measures were
improved with supplementation, since subjects who
supplemented with creatine and/or whey protein had
similar increases in squat strength and knee flexion
peak torque compared to subjects who received placebo.
|
|
| |
|
Effects of whey isolate, creatine, and resistance training on muscle hypertrophy. |
|
|
|
Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Feb;39(2):298-307. |
|
|
|
Authors: Cribb PJ, Williams AD, Stathis CG, Carey MF, Hayes A. |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Metabolism Unit, Center for Ageing, Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sport and the School of Biomedical Sciences, Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Studies that have attributed gains in
lean body mass to dietary supplementation during
resistance exercise (RE) training have not reported
these changes alongside adaptations at the cellular and
subcellular levels. Therefore, the purpose of this study
was to examine the effects of two popular
supplements--whey protein (WP) and creatine monohydrate
(CrM) (both separately and in combination)--on body
composition, muscle strength, fiber-specific hypertrophy
(i.e., type I, IIa, IIx), and contractile protein
accrual during RE training.
METHODS: In a double-blind randomized protocol,
resistance-trained males were matched for strength and
placed into one of four groups: creatine/carbohydrate (CrCHO),
creatine/whey protein (CrWP), WP only, or carbohydrate
only (CHO) (1.5 g x kg(-1) body weight per day). All
assessments were completed the week before and after an
11-wk structured, supervised RE program. Assessments
included strength (1RM, three exercises), body
composition (DEXA), and vastus lateralis muscle biopsies
for determination of muscle fiber type (I, IIa, IIx),
cross-sectional area (CSA), contractile protein, and
creatine (Cr) content. RESULTS: Supplementation with
CrCHO, WP, and CrWP resulted in significantly greater (P
< 0.05) 1RM strength improvements (three of three
assessments) and muscle hypertrophy compared with CHO.
Up to 76% of the strength improvements in the squat
could be attributed to hypertrophy of muscle involved in
this exercise. However, the hypertrophy responses within
these groups varied at the three levels assessed (i.e.,
changes in lean mass, fiber-specific hypertrophy, and
contractile protein content).
CONCLUSIONS: Although WP and/or CrM seem to
promote greater strength gains and muscle morphology
during RE training, the hypertrophy responses within the
groups varied. These differences in skeletal muscle
morphology may have important implications for various
populations and, therefore, warrant further
investigation.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home >
Research Studies >
Whey Protein & Muscle |
|